- The major ethical concern with bite mark analysis is its high risk of subjective interpretation.
- Unlike other forensic methods, bite mark patterns are often ambiguous and open to personal bias, leading to inconsistent and unreliable conclusions.
- This subjectivity can result in wrongful convictions or acquittals, raising serious ethical issues regarding justice and accuracy.
- The lack of objective standards further compounds this problem, making bite mark evidence controversial in forensic science.

Reference: Forensic Science: Fundamentals and Investigations, Volume 2, Chapter 8, Page 245