dump (128 টি প্রশ্ন )
 Back to Subject Page   All Topics
Extraction is usually NOT required in Class II division II malocclusion because these cases often present with crowded incisors but reduced overjet and deep bite. The naturally retroclined upper incisors limit the need for space creation through extractions. Instead, orthodontic treatment focuses on retraction and uprighting of incisors rather than premolar extraction to relieve crowding. This contrasts with Class II division I, where extractions are frequently needed to reduce protrusion and overjet. Therefore, extractions are less common in Class II division II cases due to the different dental and skeletal relationships.

Reference: Proffit’s Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
Edward H. Angle is regarded as the father of modern orthodontics because he developed the first comprehensive classification system of malocclusions, which remains the foundation for diagnosis and treatment planning today. He also designed specialized orthodontic appliances and introduced standardized techniques, greatly advancing the field’s scientific and clinical practice. His contributions established orthodontics as a distinct dental specialty focused on correcting dental and skeletal malalignments to improve function and aesthetics. Angle’s systematic approach and innovations set the standards for modern orthodontic treatment protocols.

Reference: Graber’s Orthodontics, 7th Edition.
Extraction solely to relieve crowding without subsequent orthodontic treatment can lead to malalignment of teeth and improper occlusal relationships. This uncoordinated spacing affects the articulation of sounds, particularly sibilants and labiodentals, resulting in disturbed speech. Without orthodontic guidance, the teeth do not properly reposition, causing gaps or misfits that impair tongue placement and airflow during speech. Therefore, extraction alone disrupts the oral environment necessary for clear phonetics.
Reference: Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology, 7th Edition.
Incisor teeth play a crucial role in maintaining proper vertical dimension and occlusal relationships. Extracting incisors can disrupt the anterior guidance, leading to a loss of vertical support and causing a tendency for the bite to deepen abnormally. This results from the over-eruption of opposing teeth and increased mandibular closure, which can compromise both function and facial aesthetics. Therefore, preserving incisors is important to prevent the development of an abnormally deep bite and maintain occlusal stability.

Reference: Essentials of Orthodontics, Richard Lee, 4th Edition.
Extraction of second permanent molars is contraindicated in the presence of impacted third molars because the third molars may not erupt properly afterward, leading to potential space loss, malocclusion, or impaction complications. Removing the second molar when a third molar is impacted can result in inadequate eruption guidance and poor alignment of the third molar. Preservation of the second molar is crucial to maintain occlusion and arch stability unless the third molar is fully erupted and can functionally replace the second molar. This surgical consideration ensures optimal dental arch integrity and avoids complex future interventions.

Reference: Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 7th Edition.
First permanent molars serve a critical role in maintaining proper occlusion and arch integrity. Extraction should be avoided if third molars are absent because there will be no natural posterior replacement to prevent mesial drift of second molars. This can lead to loss of arch length, malocclusion, and difficulties in future prosthetic or orthodontic treatment. When third molars are present, they can potentially erupt into the space of the extracted first molar, preserving function. Therefore, the presence or absence of third molars is a key surgical consideration before deciding to extract first permanent molars.

Reference: Shafer's Textbook of Oral Pathology, 8th Edition.
Extraction of second premolars instead of first premolars is considered when the second premolars are severely carious because it allows preservation of the healthier first premolars, which better maintain occlusion and arch integrity. Removing a tooth with extensive decay prevents potential infection and complications, while maintaining teeth that are structurally sound aids in effective orthodontic space closure. This approach minimizes the risk of further dental morbidity and optimizes surgical outcomes. Extraction of non-carious teeth simply for rotation or impaction is not standard unless other clinical indications exist.

Reference: Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 21st Edition.
Compensating extraction refers to the removal of teeth in both the same and opposite dental arches to maintain occlusal balance and function. This type of extraction helps prevent the overeruption of unopposed teeth and maintains the proper relationship between the upper and lower arches. It is commonly used in orthodontics and prosthodontics to achieve symmetrical occlusion and avoid complications caused by uneven tooth loss. The key surgical point is that extractions are planned in a way that supports balanced occlusal contact between maxillary and mandibular teeth.

Reference: Textbook of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis, Nairn Wilson, 8th Edition.
Balancing extraction refers to the removal of a tooth on one side of the dental arch and a corresponding tooth on the opposite side of the same arch to maintain dental midline symmetry and occlusal balance. This procedure helps prevent the shifting of teeth and midline deviation, ensuring proper alignment and function. It is particularly important when an extraction is necessary due to caries, trauma, or orthodontic requirements, and maintaining the midline is critical for both aesthetic and functional outcomes in dental treatment planning.

Reference: Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology, 7th Edition.

ফ্রিতে ২ লাখ প্রশ্নের টপিক, সাব-টপিক ভিত্তিক ও ১০০০+ জব শুলুশন্স বিস্তারিতে ব্যাখ্যাসহ পড়তে ও আপনার পড়ার ট্র্যাকিং রাখতে সাইটে লগইন করুন।

লগইন করুন
The term interceptive orthodontic procedures refers to early treatments aimed at preventing or minimizing developing malocclusions in the mixed dentition stage. Options like serial extraction, space regainer, and correction of crossbite are direct orthodontic interventions addressing tooth eruption and alignment issues. In contrast, managing an oral habit (such as thumb sucking) is primarily a myofunctional or behavioral modification approach, not a direct orthodontic corrective procedure. Thus, oral habit management does not classify as an interceptive orthodontic treatment since it does not involve mechanical correction of tooth or jaw position.

Reference: Graber's Orthodontics, 7th Edition.
Space maintainers are preventive orthodontic appliances used to preserve the space left by premature loss of primary teeth. They help to prevent undesirable tooth movement, such as drifting or tipping of adjacent teeth, which could lead to crowding or malocclusion in the permanent dentition. By maintaining the arch length, they facilitate the proper eruption of permanent teeth and reduce the need for more complex orthodontic interventions later. Unlike other options, space maintainers do not actively move teeth but serve to prevent potential orthodontic problems.

Reference: Proffit, Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The correct answer is Space gainer because it is a corrective, not preventive, orthodontic procedure. Preventive orthodontics aims to preserve existing space and guide proper eruption to avoid malocclusion, as seen with space maintainers, oral hygiene instructions, and fluoride application. In contrast, space gainers are used to regain lost space after premature tooth loss or crowding has occurred, thus functioning as an interceptive or corrective measure rather than purely preventive.

Reference: Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The moment to force ratio (M/F) for bodily movement of a tooth is ideally 8:10. This ratio ensures that the force applied moves the tooth bodily without tipping. A lower M/F ratio results in uncontrolled tipping, whereas a higher ratio causes root movement or torque. For bodily movement, the moment generated by the force must counteract the rotational tendency, requiring a higher moment relative to the force, hence the ratio close to 0.8 (8:10). This balance allows uniform displacement of both the crown and root simultaneously. Proper control of this ratio is critical during orthodontic treatment for effective and safe tooth movement.

Reference: Proffit, Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The center of resistance of a tooth is the point where a single force results in pure translation without rotation. It is located approximately at the midpoint of the embedded portion of the root because this is where the tooth’s supporting structures, including the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone, provide optimal resistance. Forces applied at this point produce controlled tooth movement crucial in orthodontics and prosthodontics. Understanding this location helps in planning effective force application for tooth movement or stabilization during surgical procedures.

Reference: Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
Nitinol wire is a shape memory alloy primarily composed of nickel and titanium, exhibiting unique properties such as superelasticity and thermal shape memory. Due to its sensitive phase transformation and high nickel content, traditional soldering or welding methods can alter its microstructure, leading to loss of superelastic properties and mechanical strength. Additionally, the high temperatures involved in soldering or welding often cause oxidation and degradation of Nitinol’s functional characteristics. In contrast, stainless steel, gold, and TMA wires maintain their properties better with conventional joining techniques. Therefore, joining Nitinol wire using soldering or welding is not recommended for clinical use to preserve its functionality and biocompatibility.

Reference: Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The βTMA (Beta Titanium) wire is most useful for space closure and finishing because it offers an optimal balance of flexibility and strength. This allows for precise, controlled force application, essential for effective tooth movement during the finishing phase. βTMA wires have a lower modulus of elasticity compared to stainless steel, providing better springback and resilience. They also allow for easy adjustment without permanent deformation, facilitating fine-tuning of tooth positions. These mechanical properties make βTMA wires ideal for delicate movements and space closure, improving treatment efficiency and outcomes.

Reference: Proffit, Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
Nitinol wire is an alloy of nickel and titanium known for its superelasticity and shape memory properties. These unique characteristics allow it to return to its original shape after deformation, making it highly resistant to permanent bending or looping. Unlike stainless steel, gold, or TMA wires, nitinol cannot be easily manipulated into loops because it automatically recovers its straight form when the bending stress is removed. This property is crucial in clinical applications where maintaining wire shape and reducing permanent deformation is required. Therefore, nitinol wire is almost impossible to bend into loops due to its intrinsic metal behavior.

Reference: Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 6th Edition.
Nitinol wire is widely known for its unique shape memory and excellent elasticity, allowing it to return to its original shape after deformation. It also demonstrates good corrosion resistance, making it suitable for various medical implants. However, nitinol has poor formability, meaning it is difficult to shape or bend permanently without specialized processing techniques. This limits its use in applications requiring extensive manual shaping during surgery. Understanding this limitation is crucial when selecting materials for surgical devices that demand precise molding or adjustments in the operating room.

Reference: Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 3rd Edition.
Finger springs for removable appliances are best made from stainless steel wire because it offers high stiffness, excellent formability, and good springback properties. Stainless steel provides the necessary strength and corrosion resistance for repeated activation without permanent deformation. It also maintains consistent force delivery, which is critical for effective tooth movement in removable appliances. Other materials like gold or nitinol lack the ideal balance of mechanical properties and cost-effectiveness required for finger springs. Therefore, stainless steel remains the material of choice in clinical orthodontics.

Reference: Graber’s Orthodontics, 7th Edition.

ফ্রিতে ২ লাখ প্রশ্নের টপিক, সাব-টপিক ভিত্তিক ও ১০০০+ জব শুলুশন্স বিস্তারিতে ব্যাখ্যাসহ পড়তে ও আপনার পড়ার ট্র্যাকিং রাখতে সাইটে লগইন করুন।

লগইন করুন
The preferred wire for initial alignment in orthodontics is the Nitinol wire because it exhibits superelasticity and shape memory, allowing for gentle, continuous forces that effectively align teeth without causing excessive discomfort. Its low stiffness and high springback make it ideal for engaging severely malaligned or crowded teeth. This wire also provides consistent force over a longer activation range, reducing the need for frequent adjustments. Compared to stainless steel or TMA wires, Nitinol promotes more efficient and biologically favorable tooth movement in the early stages of treatment.

Reference: Proffit, Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
Titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA) wires offer an optimal balance of flexibility and stiffness, making them ideal for precise torque control during the final tooth inclination adjustment. TMA provides a consistent, moderate force that allows effective root movement without risking excessive stress or unwanted tooth movement. Its excellent springback and formability enable customization of torque bends, essential for fine adjustments. Unlike stainless steel, TMA has superior biocompatibility and resilience to maintain the desired force level over time. This combination ensures efficient and controlled torque application, critical for final treatment stages.

Reference: Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, Graber, Edition 6.
Nitinol wire exhibits shape memory primarily because of its ability to undergo reversible phase transformations. It retains its memorized shape in the Martensite form, which is a low-temperature, easily deformable phase. When heated, it transforms to the Austenite form, causing it to return to its original shape. This characteristic is crucial for surgical applications like stents and orthodontic wires, where precise shape recovery under body temperature is essential. The Martensite phase allows Nitinol to be manipulated and deformed without permanent damage, enabling minimally invasive procedures and improved patient outcomes.

Reference: Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, 3rd Edition.
Nitinol wire exhibits shape memory properties due to its unique alloy composition of nickel and titanium. When deformed at a lower temperature, it can return to its original shape upon heating, a phenomenon known as the shape memory effect. This property allows for gentle and continuous force application during orthodontic treatment, improving tooth movement efficiency and patient comfort. Other wires like stainless steel lack this capability as they do not have the reversible phase transformation characteristic of nitinol. Thus, nitinol is the preferred material when shape memory is required in orthodontics.

Reference: Graber's Orthodontics, 7th Edition.
The correct formulation of 18% chromium and 8% nickel corresponds to stainless steel commonly used in orthodontic wires. Chromium at 18% provides excellent corrosion resistance, essential for the oral environment. Nickel at 8% enhances the wire’s flexibility and strength, critical for effective tooth movement. This balance maintains biocompatibility while ensuring mechanical properties necessary for orthodontic treatment. Lower percentages reduce corrosion resistance and mechanical performance, while higher percentages may alter these key characteristics adversely. Therefore, the 18/8 ratio is the standard for durability and clinical effectiveness in orthodontics.

Reference: Graber's Orthodontics, 7th Edition.
Skeletal changes require sustained application of force to stimulate bone remodeling through the process of bone resorption and apposition. Studies have demonstrated that forces applied for a minimum of 8-10 hours per day are necessary to produce significant and stable skeletal changes without causing damage or unnecessary patient discomfort. Forces applied for less than this duration typically result in insufficient biological response, while continuous force (24 hrs) may lead to adverse effects like root resorption. Hence, 8-10 hrs/day balances effective skeletal remodeling with patient safety and comfort.

Reference: Proffit W, Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The force required to separate the mid-palatal suture during adolescence is approximately 2000 gm due to increased interdigitation and ossification of the suture with age. By adolescence, the suture becomes more rigid, necessitating greater force to achieve expansion compared to childhood. This value guides clinicians in applying appropriate orthopedic forces during rapid maxillary expansion (RME) to avoid complications such as suture fractures or dental tipping. Understanding this threshold is essential for effective orthopedic management of maxillary deficiency in adolescent patients.

Reference: Contemporary Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
The minimum force required to retard and redirect maxillary growth is 300-400 gm/side because this range provides sufficient pressure to influence sutural growth and remodeling without causing tissue damage or patient discomfort. Forces below this threshold (<100-200 gm) are generally inadequate to produce significant orthopedic changes, while higher forces (>500 gm) risk adverse effects such as root resorption or soft tissue irritation. Applying a consistent force of 300-400 gm per side optimizes the balance between efficacy and safety in maxillary orthopedic treatments, ensuring effective growth modification.

Reference: Graber Orthodontics, 6th Edition.
Tooth movement in orthodontics occurs through remodeling of the alveolar bone. Frontal resorption involves direct resorption of the bone adjacent to the moving tooth, allowing for smooth and controlled displacement. This process preserves the integrity of the bone and periodontal ligament, resulting in more physiological and efficient tooth movement. In contrast, undermining resorption involves resorption away from the bone surface, causing delayed and less favorable movement. Hence, frontal resorption is preferred for predictable orthodontic tooth movement with minimal tissue damage.

Reference: Graber’s Orthodontics, 7th Edition.
The Blood flow theory explains orthodontic tooth movement by emphasizing the role of vascular changes in the periodontal ligament (PDL). When force is applied, it alters the blood flow in the PDL, leading to a cascade of biological responses including bone remodeling. Reduced blood flow in the compressed area induces bone resorption, while increased flow in the tension area promotes bone formation. This dynamic vascular response is critical for the remodeling necessary for tooth movement. Hence, blood flow alterations directly regulate the cellular activity responsible for orthodontic tooth movement.

Reference: Graber's Orthodontics, 7th Edition.

ফ্রিতে ২ লাখ প্রশ্নের টপিক, সাব-টপিক ভিত্তিক ও ১০০০+ জব শুলুশন্স বিস্তারিতে ব্যাখ্যাসহ পড়তে ও আপনার পড়ার ট্র্যাকিং রাখতে সাইটে লগইন করুন।

লগইন করুন
Intermittent orthodontic force is applied only when the appliance is in place and stops immediately upon its removal. This means the force does not gradually diminish but instead declines abruptly to zero. This characteristic impacts the biological response, as the periodontal ligament and bone remodeling processes pause during the intervals without force. Continuous or gradual force application differs by maintaining some stimulus even when the appliance is inactive. Understanding this helps in planning timing and appliance wear for effective tooth movement.

Reference: Contemporary Orthodontics, William R. Proffit, 6th Edition.
সঠিক উত্তর: 0 | ভুল উত্তর: 0